I also checked the compile, all tests pass, gpg sign, and md5 sign. +1 for both the source release and the binary tarball release. -- Hyunsik Choi
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Giraphers- > I've created a candidate for our first release. It's a source release > without a binary for two reasons: first, there's still discussion > going on about what needs to be done for the NOTICE and LICENSE files > for projects that bring in transitive dependencies to the binary > release ( > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg32693.html) > and second because we're still munging our binary against three types > of Hadoop, which would mean we'd need to release three different > binary artifacts, which seems suboptimal. Hopefully both of these > issues will be addressed by 0.2. > > I've tested the release against an unsecure 20.2 cluster. It'd be > great to test it against other configurations. Note that we're voting > on the tag; the files are provided as a convenience. > > Release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/RELEASE_NOTES.html > > Release artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/ > > Corresponding svn tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/tags/release-0.1-rc0/ > > Our signing keys (my key doesn't seem to be being picked up by > http://people.apache.org/keys/group/giraph.asc): > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/KEYS > > The vote runs for 72 hours, until Friday 4pm PST. After a successful > vote here, Incubator will vote on the release as well. > > Thanks, > Jakob >
