I also checked the compile, all tests pass, gpg sign, and md5 sign.

+1 for both the source release and the binary tarball release.
Hyunsik Choi

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Giraphers-
> I've created a candidate for our first release. It's a source release
> without a binary for two reasons: first, there's still discussion
> going on about what needs to be done for the NOTICE and LICENSE files
> for projects that bring in transitive dependencies to the binary
> release (
> http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg32693.html)
> and second because we're still munging our binary against three types
> of Hadoop, which would mean we'd need to release three different
> binary artifacts, which seems suboptimal.  Hopefully both of these
> issues will be addressed by 0.2.
> I've tested the release against an unsecure 20.2 cluster.  It'd be
> great to test it against other configurations.  Note that we're voting
> on the tag; the files are provided as a convenience.
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> Release artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/
> Corresponding svn tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/tags/release-0.1-rc0/
> Our signing keys (my key doesn't seem to be being picked up by
> http://people.apache.org/keys/group/giraph.asc):
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/KEYS
> The vote runs for 72 hours, until Friday 4pm PST.  After a successful
> vote here, Incubator will vote on the release as well.
> Thanks,
> Jakob

Reply via email to