On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael J Gruber
> <g...@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:

>> For one thing, contributors on the kernel list are open to technical
>> arguments, and that includes the arguments of others; just like we are
>> here. On the other hand, you seem to rebuke "any" (most) technical
>> argument in harsh words as if it were a personal attack; at least that's
>> how your answers come across to me (and apparently others). That really
>> makes it difficult for most of us here to argue with you technically,
>> which is a pity. That lack of openness for the arguments of others would
>> make your life difficult on the kernel list also.


> If that's not the case, show me a single instance when I rebuke
> technical arguments in *harsh* words... perhaps, you think any
> rebuking is "harsh". Specifically, show me an instance were *I* was
> harsh, and the reviewer was not.
> If you cannot show instances of this, then your statement that I
> rebuke harshly doesn't stand; I rebuke, that's all.

In addition to this, I'm still waiting for an answer of what's wrong
with the words that started this thread:

On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:

> It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own.


Felipe Contreras
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to