"郑文辉(Techlive Zheng)"  <techlivezh...@gmail.com> writes:

> Though, this patch defintely should be merged, becuase no one expects
> his commit message be altered durging the splitting process.

Are you saying that after double-checking what was posted?  It said
something like this below, which does not look like 'definitely
should be' to me.

diff --git a/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh b/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh
index 920c664..f2b6d4a 100755
--- a/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh
+++ b/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh
@@ -296,7 +296,12 @@ copy_commit()
        # We're going to set some environment vars here, so
        # do it in a subshell to get rid of them safely later
        debug copy_commit "{$1}" "{$2}" "{$3}"
+       # Use %B rather than %s%n%n%b to handle the special case of a
+       # commit that only has a subject line.  We don't want to
+       # introduce a newline after the subject, causing generation of
+       # a new hash.
        git log -1 --pretty=format:'%an%n%ae%n%ad%n%cn%n%ce%n%cd%n%s%n%n%b' 
"$1" |
+#      git log -1 --pretty=format:'%an%n%ae%n%ad%n%cn%n%ce%n%cd%n%B' "$1" |
        (
                read GIT_AUTHOR_NAME
                read GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to