Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:

> The question was about the lossage of the blank line, which does not
> seem to be related to what this patch wants to do.

Ah, missed that.

>>>> -# 25
>>>> +#25
>>>
>>> Why the lossage of a SP?
>>
>> I think this got fixed later in the series.
>
> That is not a good excuse to introduce breakages in the first place, no?

Oh, I agree.  I wasn't making excuses.  :)

>>> It may make sense to lose these "# num" that will have to be touched
>>> every time somebody inserts new test pieces in the middle, as a
>>> preparatory step before any of these patches, by the way.  That will
>>> reduce noise in the patches for real changes.
>>
>> Yeah, I know, but it makes it really easy to find a test when something
>> goes wrong.
>
> That is what "tXXXX-*.sh -i" is for, isn't it?

Oh, I didn't know about that!

                        -David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to