Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > The question was about the lossage of the blank line, which does not > seem to be related to what this patch wants to do.
Ah, missed that. >>>> -# 25 >>>> +#25 >>> >>> Why the lossage of a SP? >> >> I think this got fixed later in the series. > > That is not a good excuse to introduce breakages in the first place, no? Oh, I agree. I wasn't making excuses. :) >>> It may make sense to lose these "# num" that will have to be touched >>> every time somebody inserts new test pieces in the middle, as a >>> preparatory step before any of these patches, by the way. That will >>> reduce noise in the patches for real changes. >> >> Yeah, I know, but it makes it really easy to find a test when something >> goes wrong. > > That is what "tXXXX-*.sh -i" is for, isn't it? Oh, I didn't know about that! -David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html