gree...@obbligato.org writes: > Ack, of course. I don't know how I missed that. > >>> # 15 >>> test_expect_success 'add main6' ' >>> create main6 && >> >> Why? > > It was in the original testsuite from Avery. I didn't add or remove any > tests when I first integrated git-subtree.
The question was about the lossage of the blank line, which does not seem to be related to what this patch wants to do. >>> -# 25 >>> +#25 >> >> Why the lossage of a SP? > > I think this got fixed later in the series. That is not a good excuse to introduce breakages in the first place, no? >> It may make sense to lose these "# num" that will have to be touched >> every time somebody inserts new test pieces in the middle, as a >> preparatory step before any of these patches, by the way. That will >> reduce noise in the patches for real changes. > > Yeah, I know, but it makes it really easy to find a test when something > goes wrong. That is what "tXXXX-*.sh -i" is for, isn't it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html