Eric Sunshine <[email protected]> writes:
> Accept multiple patch files rather than only one. For example:
>
> % git contacts feature/*.patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <[email protected]>
> @@ -93,6 +96,7 @@ sub commits_from_patch {
> while (<$f>) {
> if (/^From ($id_rx) /o) {
> $id = $1;
> + $seen{$id} = 1;
> last;
> }
> }
This looks less useful than it could be.
$ git format-patch --stdout -4 >P.mbox
$ git contacts P.mbox
would have the same number of patches but in a single file.
Wouldn't it be more useful to do something like
$id = undef;
while (<$f>) {
if (/^From ([0-9a-f]{40}) Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001$/) {
# beginning of a patch
$id = $1;
}
next if (!defined $id);
# inline the body of scan_hunks here...
if (m{^--- (a/.*|/dev/null)$}) {
$source = ...
} elsif (/^@@ -(\d+)...) {
get_blame();
}
}
> @@ -100,10 +104,8 @@ sub commits_from_patch {
> close $f;
> }
>
> -exit 1 unless @ARGV == 1;
> -
> my %commits;
> -commits_from_patch(\%commits, $ARGV[0]);
> +commits_from_patch(\%commits, $_) for (@ARGV);
This change does not seem to account for an invocation without any
argument. Perhaps write it like so to make it more readable?
if (!@ARGV) {
die "No input file?\n";
}
for (@ARGV) {
commits_from_patch(\%commits, $_);
}
> import_commits(\%commits);
>
> my %count_per_person;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
