Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
> while (<$f>) {
> if (/^From ([0-9a-f]{40}) Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001$/) {
> # beginning of a patch
> $id = $1;
> }
> next if (!defined $id);
> # inline the body of scan_hunks here...
Or alternatively, teach scan_hunks to stop reading when it sees the
beginning of the next patch (and probably you would need to return
the $id you read, as it would be more cumbersome to "rewind" the
input stream).
> if (m{^--- (a/.*|/dev/null)$}) {
> $source = ...
> } elsif (/^@@ -(\d+)...) {
> get_blame();
> }
> }
>
>> @@ -100,10 +104,8 @@ sub commits_from_patch {
>> close $f;
>> }
>>
>> -exit 1 unless @ARGV == 1;
>> -
>> my %commits;
>> -commits_from_patch(\%commits, $ARGV[0]);
>> +commits_from_patch(\%commits, $_) for (@ARGV);
>
> This change does not seem to account for an invocation without any
> argument. Perhaps write it like so to make it more readable?
>
> if (!@ARGV) {
> die "No input file?\n";
> }
>
> for (@ARGV) {
> commits_from_patch(\%commits, $_);
> }
>
>> import_commits(\%commits);
>>
>> my %count_per_person;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
