David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 7/5/2013 8:41 PM, Kyle McKay wrote:
>> Daniel Shahaf has suggested also setting
> I have a patch that does this, but since turning on bulk updates has
> a possible performance penalty, I prefer your approach.
I assume that's because http-bulk-updates defeats caching. If so,
Please forgive my ignorance: is there a bug filed about ra_serf's
misbehavior here? Is it eventually going to be fixed and this is
just a workaround, or is the growth in temp file use something we'd
live with permanently?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html