On Jul 6, 2013, at 17:28, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
David Rothenberger wrote:
On 7/5/2013 8:41 PM, Kyle McKay wrote:
Daniel Shahaf has suggested also setting
I have a patch that does this, but since turning on bulk updates has
a possible performance penalty, I prefer your approach.
I assume that's because http-bulk-updates defeats caching. If so,
Please forgive my ignorance: is there a bug filed about ra_serf's
misbehavior here? Is it eventually going to be fixed and this is
just a workaround, or is the growth in temp file use something we'd
live with permanently?
Apparently it will not be fixed:
Begin forwarded message:
From: David Rothenberger <daver...@acm.org>
Date: July 5, 2013 16:14:12 PDT
Subject: Re: git-svn "Temp file with moniker 'svn_delta' already in
use" and skelta mode
I traced git-svn and discovered that the error is due to a known
problem in the SVN APIs. ra_serf does not drive the delta editor in
a depth-first manner as required by the API . Instead, the calls
come in this order:
This is a known issue  and one that the Subversion folks have
elected not to fix .
The summary of  which is marked RESOLVED,FIXED is "Add errata /
release note noise around ra_serf's editor drive violations".
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html