Kyle McKay wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2013, at 17:28, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> David Rothenberger wrote:
>>> On 7/5/2013 8:41 PM, Kyle McKay wrote:
>>>> Daniel Shahaf has suggested also setting
>>> I have a patch that does this, but since turning on bulk updates has
>>> a possible performance penalty, I prefer your approach.
>> I assume that's because http-bulk-updates defeats caching. If so,
>> makes sense.
>> Please forgive my ignorance: is there a bug filed about ra_serf's
>> misbehavior here? Is it eventually going to be fixed and this is
>> just a workaround, or is the growth in temp file use something we'd
>> live with permanently?
> Begin forwarded message:
>>  http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2932
Ah, thanks for the context.
It's still not clear to me how we know that ra_serf driving the editor
in a non depth-first manner is the problem here. Has that explanation
been confirmed somehow?
For example, does the workaround mentioned by danielsh work? Does
using ra_neon instead of ra_serf avoid trouble as well? Is there a
simple explanation of why violating the depth-first constraint would
lead to multiple blob (i.e., file, not directory) deltas being opened
in a row without an intervening close?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html