David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > Philippe Vaucher <philippe.vauc...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Thanks for the explanation. I think it underlines well the A) >> technical issues (quality commits) and the B) social issues (ability >> to communicate in a friendly way & respond constructively), which we >> discovered are both *essential* for contributing to git. > > I'm not entirely convinced of that: there is something akin to drop-dead > gorgeous code: code that is so well done that it would not matter with > regard to its maintenance whether or not its author dropped dead because > it's both done well as well as documented in a manner where the original > author could not offer significant additional help.
I would have to say that you are living in a fantasy land. During the entire life of Git, I do not think I ever saw such a code that is perfect from the get-go and did not require any maintenance to adjust to the changing time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html