David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
> Philippe Vaucher <philippe.vauc...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Thanks for the explanation. I think it underlines well the A)
>> technical issues (quality commits) and the B) social issues (ability
>> to communicate in a friendly way & respond constructively), which we
>> discovered are both *essential* for contributing to git.
> I'm not entirely convinced of that: there is something akin to drop-dead
> gorgeous code: code that is so well done that it would not matter with
> regard to its maintenance whether or not its author dropped dead because
> it's both done well as well as documented in a manner where the original
> author could not offer significant additional help.
I would have to say that you are living in a fantasy land. During
the entire life of Git, I do not think I ever saw such a code that
is perfect from the get-go and did not require any maintenance to
adjust to the changing time.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html