Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
> David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
>> Philippe Vaucher <philippe.vauc...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Thanks for the explanation. I think it underlines well the A)
>>> technical issues (quality commits) and the B) social issues (ability
>>> to communicate in a friendly way & respond constructively), which we
>>> discovered are both *essential* for contributing to git.
>> I'm not entirely convinced of that: there is something akin to drop-dead
>> gorgeous code: code that is so well done that it would not matter with
>> regard to its maintenance whether or not its author dropped dead because
>> it's both done well as well as documented in a manner where the original
>> author could not offer significant additional help.
> I would have to say that you are living in a fantasy land. During
> the entire life of Git, I do not think I ever saw such a code that
> is perfect from the get-go and did not require any maintenance to
> adjust to the changing time.
You are attacking a straw man. "where the original author could not
offer significant _additional_ help" does not at all equate "does not
require any maintenance".
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html