> The problem is that that now it looks this way: What I mean is, yes its very ugly[^1], and that makes it hard for humans to use, but it doesn't crash or provide wrong information. We seem to have concentrated on C++ (probably my fault) but its likely to be useful for simple situations (ie not C++ :-)
I would expect that for languages without overloading like C there will only be a few in the popup when multiple versions of the same file are open, and then the file/line and signature is likely to be useful as @kugel- [said](https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3542#issuecomment-1687448806). So how bad is it for non-C++ languages, say C and Python, thats one non-overloading and one overloading? That should decide if we need to revert #3475, if it works ok for most languages my vote would be leave it and improve it from there. At this point we don't seem to have an agreed PR, and jamming something that cannot be well tested into 2.0 is a risky way to do it, that just leads to 2.0.1 (ask @eht16). [^1]: what makes it uglier in the screen grabs above is that the popup is in dark on a Geany that is light, thats weird. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3547#issuecomment-1751986061 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3547/[email protected]>
