tustvold commented on code in PR #2906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/2906#discussion_r923327000
##########
datafusion/core/src/datasource/object_store.rs:
##########
@@ -132,19 +149,41 @@ impl ObjectStoreRegistry {
///
/// - URL with scheme `file:///` or no schema will return the default
LocalFS store
/// - URL with scheme `s3://bucket/` will return the S3 store if it's
registered
+ /// - URL with scheme `hdfs://hostname:port/` will return the hdfs store
if it's registered
///
pub fn get_by_url(&self, url: impl AsRef<Url>) -> Result<Arc<dyn
ObjectStore>> {
let url = url.as_ref();
- let s = &url[url::Position::BeforeScheme..url::Position::AfterHost];
- let stores = self.object_stores.read();
- let store = stores.get(s).ok_or_else(|| {
- DataFusionError::Internal(format!(
- "No suitable object store found for {}",
- url
- ))
- })?;
-
- Ok(store.clone())
+ // First check whether can get object store from registry
+ let store = {
+ let stores = self.object_stores.read();
+ let s =
&url[url::Position::BeforeScheme..url::Position::BeforePath];
+ stores.get(s).cloned()
+ };
+
+ // If not, then try to detector based on its url.
+ let store = store
Review Comment:
In the uncontended case, which is extremely likely given how short the
critical section is, they will perform exactly the same - if anything the Mutex
might be marginally faster. It was more an observation that the complexity of
using a RWLock is probably not actually yielding any return
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
