berkaysynnada commented on PR #8891: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/8891#issuecomment-1933879947
It's important to me that the behavior of the `Jump` remains consistent, whether we are traversing from the top-down or bottom-up. For the use case, you can consider a scenario where the user only interested in the leaf node transformations or investigations. This can be efficiently and easily managed by using `transform_up` with a rule that returns `Recursion::Jump`. The term "Jump" is intuitively understandable in this context, enabling users to grasp the intended functionality with ease. On the other hand, using "Prune" could lead to confusion, as it might imply the removal of nodes from the tree beyond the current point. In reality, we're just bypassing the child nodes, not eliminating any section of the tree. An example usage: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/traversal-tree-ability-jump-nodes-height/ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
