comphead commented on code in PR #1667:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1667#discussion_r2054587262
##########
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/CometSparkSessionExtensions.scala:
##########
@@ -161,10 +161,28 @@ class CometSparkSessionExtensions
}
if (!schemaSupported) {
- fallbackReasons += s"Unsupported schema ${scanExec.requiredSchema}
for $scanImpl"
+ val field: Option[StructField] =
+ CometNativeScanExec
+ .findUnsupportedField(scanExec.requiredSchema)
+
.orElse(CometScanExec.findUnsupportedField(scanExec.requiredSchema))
+ assert(field.nonEmpty)
+ fallbackReasons +=
+ s"Unsupported field ${field.get} in schema
${scanExec.requiredSchema} for $scanImpl"
Review Comment:
Field sounds good to me, but now I'm wondering how it may look like if
unsupported datatype like BYTE is deep nested field?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
