On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Lomborg essentially accepts the ipcc consensus o the physics, though not on > > the > > action. > > Maybe my earlier message got lost. > > What is the consensus on action that differs from what Lomborg is > proposing? > > As far as I am aware the IPCC has no mandate to decide the best course > of action, that remains up to the political process in member states.
Fair point. You are right - there isn't really an IPCC consensus on action, at last in the bits I've read, though I haven't really read WG II or III. I'm not sure what action l is proposing though -mostly, as far as I can tell, do otjher things first - ie, implicityl, do nothing about GW. -W. > > William M Connolley | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/met/wmc/ Climate Modeller, British Antarctic Survey | (01223) 221479 If I haven't seen further, it's because giants were standing on my shoulders -- This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
