Don Libby wrote:

> The chart at the start: "Selected MDG Indicators for 177 Countries"
> http://www.pelican-consulting.com/solisustv02n07.html

Hello Don,

You are right.  This is not a chart of trends over time.  It is a chart 
of trends over countries.  The idea is to see if there is a difference 
between countries where rigid religious patriarchies are influential in 
society and countries where the opposite is true.  You can check the 
country names in the UN database:

http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005/pdf/HDR05_HDI.pdf

On the horizontal axis, the countries are ordered in *ascending* value 
of HDI (Human Development Indicator).  If you look at the names of the 
countries so ordered, left to right ...

The first 20 countries have the lowest HDI scores and include ...
-- 16 countries with dominant *very strong* patriarchal religion
-- 4 countries with religious diversity and no dominant religion

The last 20 countries have the highest HDI scores and include ...
-- 3 countries with dominant *strong* patriarchal religion
-- 17 countries with religious diversity and no dominant religion

So there are some exceptions, but the other indicators roughly follow 
the same "trend" (i.e., "ceteris paribus", as the economists say when 
they know that there may be other factors involved).  So again, "ceteris 
paribus," the countries with patriarchal religions/societies score low 
and the countries with less patriarchal religions/societies score high.

[...]

> Seems plausible.  However, I think religious communities generally enforce 
> conformity by the threat of ostracism or social isolation, rather than by 
> the threat of violence.  So I can see the effect of religion on fertility 
> via patriarchal doctrine, but the connection to religious violence still 
> isn't clear.

There are many forms of violence in both religion and society: physical 
violence, psychological violence, moral violence ... many women hear 
from their clergy that "if your husband is beating you it must be that 
you are not pleasing him" ... many women hear from the clergy that "if 
you don't obey your husband you are going to hell" ... etc.  This sort 
of moral/religious violence has a profound effect (for example, via the 
"collective unconscious") in family life and all other dimensions of 
social life.

[...]

> You also mention several examples of bias and violence against women (e.g. 
> sex slavery, female infanticide), but the connection to religious violence 
> isn't clear.  Why isn't this thread called "Global impacts of patriarchal 
> violence"?

Because (this is the working hypothesis) social-patriarchal violence is 
rooted in religious violence.  The thread could be called "Global 
impacts of patriarchal violence rooted in religious violence," but this 
would be a long subject line ... By the way, this is not *my* working 
hypothesis ... I got the idea from the writings of a philosopher and 
theological anthropologist, René Girard, who has provided plenty of 
supporting evidence based on linguistic analysis of sacred texts from 
all the so-called "axial religions" (i.e., texts written roughly between 
800 and 200 BCE).  I am simply searching for other kinds of objective 
evidence that would seem to support (or contradict) the hypothesis.  It 
is a very critical issue for humanity and, if Girard is right, religion 
is a factor that should be included in any analysis of global change.

Sorry, but I cannot resist the temptation to suggest that you may want 
to consider sections 1 and 4 of the August issue of my newsletter ...

http://www.pelican-consulting.com/solisustv02n08.html

and then you are just one click away from reading this month's invited 
paper by Michael Hardin which is (surprise!) a tutorial on the work of 
René Girard (he is an expert ... I am just a neophyte).

Take care,

Luis





















--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change.

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to