---- Original Message ----- 
From: "Luis Gutierrez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.science.general.global-change
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 11:39 PM
Subject: [Global Change: 513] Re: Global Impacts of Religious Violence


>[quote lg]
The first 20 countries have the lowest HDI scores and include ...
-- 16 countries with dominant *very strong* patriarchal religion
-- 4 countries with religious diversity and no dominant religion

The last 20 countries have the highest HDI scores and include ...
-- 3 countries with dominant *strong* patriarchal religion
-- 17 countries with religious diversity and no dominant religion
>[end lg]

I see that is how you interpret the graph - what is missing for me is a 
*measure* of patriarchy by which you might illustrate the relationship, in 
much the way that I have illustrated the relationship between religion and 
fertility by producing data compiled with religion on one axis and fertility 
on the other.

After much discussion, suffice to say you've convinced me that we could 
probably agree which countries are dominated by patriarchal religions after 
sifting through news accounts to count the number of infidel beheadings, 
deaths by stoning, burkas, female clergy, etc.

So we agree there is an association with level of socioeconomic development 
and the prevalence (or dominance or strength) of patriarchal religion.  But, 
still too soon to conclude there is a causal relationship.

>[quote lg]
you don't obey your husband you are going to hell" ... etc.  This sort
of moral/religious violence has a profound effect (for example, via the
"collective unconscious") in family life and all other dimensions of
social life.
>[end lg]

No doubt fear and terror are effective means of behavioral control.  So are 
guilt and shame, but their link to violence is less clear; they seem more 
strongly related to social approval or disapproval.

>[quote lg]
800 and 200 BCE).  I am simply searching for other kinds of objective
evidence that would seem to support (or contradict) the hypothesis.  It
is a very critical issue for humanity and, if Girard is right, religion
is a factor that should be included in any analysis of global change.

Sorry, but I cannot resist the temptation to suggest that you may want
to consider sections 1 and 4 of the August issue of my newsletter ...

http://www.pelican-consulting.com/solisustv02n08.html
>[end lg]

I appreciate and applaud your search for evidence - indeed that is what 
holds my interest here.  I hope you don't mind my "oppositional" rhetoric, 
it is simply an exercise in skepticism such that we may learn something from 
explanations when they are called for.

One bit of logic calls for explanation:  how may a constant explain change? 
Sections 1 and 4 speak of "ubiquitous" violence - everywhere, and for a very 
long time.  If there has been a regime of ubiquitous patriarchal violence 
for something like 2000 years, how can that explain the massive global 
changes of the past 200 years, measurable by such indicators as the size of 
the human population, atmospheric CO2 concentration, or global average 
surface temperature?

I think we may have to seek material explanations (the industrial 
revolution) and point to "patriarchally dominant" religion as a drag on 
industrial development, rather than a driving force of change.  Technical 
change leading, cultural change lagging, or in more anthropological terms: 
material culture changing more rapidly than immaterial culture.  Seems there 
is a story to be told of the patriarchal mind set replaced by the "western 
liberal" mind set, accompanied as it has been by "the protestant ethic and 
the spirit of capitalism", to coin a phase.

Have you encountered Alex Inkeles' "psychological modernity" theory of 
development?

Regards,
-dl 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to