On Jan 28, 3:42 am, Jay Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don Libby wrote:
> > Today I read a statement in the popular press that strikes me as absurd, but
> > is it true?
>
> > "The world must reduce carbon emissions by 90% by 2030 to avert an ecosystem
> > collapse..."
>
> Here is a chart showing less severe proposals under consideration (we
> hope) by the US Congress.
>
> http://earthtrends.wri.org/images/USEmissionsBills-2020_small.jpg
>
> The ~1990s plan was for the developing world to blaze the severe cuts
> trail first, since we have the money, expertise and technology to do
> it. The developing world would follow that path a few decades later.
> Given recent signals from the biosphere, I think their 'pause' must be
> a short one.
What are the assumptions of the "Stabilize at 450" and "Stablize at
550" lines about the rest of the world? Congress can't legislate world-
wide emissons.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
