I'm working on a post at Hot Topic about this: http://www.nbr.co.nz/home/column_article.asp?id=21153&cid=39&cname=NBR
Basically an NZ sceptic (I call 'em cranks) is using Monckton's nonsense and Spencer's tropical negative feedback paper (and a presentation made by Spencer at that Heartland Institute conference last month) to declare global warming to be over. I've been looking for feedback on the Spencer paper (Cloud and radiation budget changes associated with tropical intraseasonal oscillations RW Spencer, WD Braswell, JR Christy, J Hnilo - Geophys. Res. Lett, 2007), but haven't found much. What are his peers saying? Cheers Gareth http://hot-topic.co.nz/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
