David B. Benson wrote:
> On Apr 12, 5:48 pm, James Annan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But I still see no reason to single out
>> CO2 as a credible candidate for having had no effect whatsoever.
> Who is doing that?
Perhaps I should have said "very little effect". I meant anyone who
argues that CO2 forcing is strongly opposed by a negative feedback (eg
tropical iris).
James
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
