On Jan 10, 8:14 pm, Robbo <[email protected]> wrote:
> The wikafantasy projections are not those of the 2004 UN report at
> all.

The wiki projections are obviously based on Figure 6 of the 2004 UN
report.

You must have overlooked Figure 6.

> They take population projections to 2050 that are reproduced
> from a 2002 report as an example of hedging bets - and extrapolate the
> projections to 2100.
>
> Not to mince words - someone has deliberately distorted the report.
> The real graph can be found at figure 9.
>
> 'In these projections, world population peaks at 9.22 billion in 2075.
> Population therefore grows slightly beyond the level of 8.92 billion
> projected for 2050 in the 2002 Revision, on which these projections
> are based. However, after reaching its maximum, world population
> declines slightly and then resumes increasing, slowly, to reach a
> level of 8.97 billion by 2300, not much different from
> the projected 2050 figure.'
>
> read the report 
> at:http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/longrange2/WorldPop2300...
>
> These projections are of course sensitive to actual replacement rates
> but it is true that lower fertility rates result from the sort of
> social factors mentioned by Al Gore.  Economic development is
> essential to a continuing decline in fertility - which makes attempts
> to lower global economic growth not only potentially genocidal but
> self defeating.
>
> On Jan 11, 1:43 am, Tom Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Gore in his new book "Our Choice" seems to take it for granted that
> > world population will plateau at a bit above 9 billion in 2050 and
> > stay there till 2100. He seems to think this will happen because girls
> > will be educated, women will be empowered, and children will survive
> > as in the current 1st world.
>
> > I wonder why he adopts such a rosy senario in this one area.
>
> > There seems to be a consensus that population will reach 9 billion
> > around 2050.   But after that, the estimates run up to 14 billion.- Hide 
> > quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange

Reply via email to