On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:24:46 +0100, Alastair <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Jan 15, 7:39 pm, "Per Edman" <[email protected]> wrote:
My apologies for my poor sentence structure. That's exactly why the model I'm
currently running is NOT 100% cloud covered, or at 800C. Quite the opposite, my
model is running at an expected temperature in a completely realistic 1 atm.
Interesting this, would be amazing if one could modify the source data oneself,
but that would probably defeat the purpose of a distributed computing grid.
I tried to get hold of the source code and was blocked, but if you
appealed using the Freedom of Information Act you might be more
successful! In fact the PUM is available from the Met Office if you
can give a good academic reason.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/science/creating/daysahead/nwp/um.html
but you need good visualisation software for clouds, which I think was
specially developed by Climate Prediction.
I meant, if one was able to select the input dataset ("source data", not the
source code) for the ClimatePredition.net application, THAT could be used to answer
questions such as this. The model really is rather accurate.
/ Per
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
