----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----

With over 7000 in ercoupes, I found the Lycomings a lot better motor.  A
friend
of mine put over 3800 hrs on a piper Warrior with out doing anything
major to
the motor. When you check the logs on any Continenal motor big or small
very few
go over 1500 hrs.  A lot of the motors were made in 1946 when they made a
lot of
motors, so some of the work my have been bad. Gene

Larry Wilkins wrote:

> Thanks Gene,   Good to have a vote of confidence.  It's a simple thing
to
> find out how long the engines last before Major OH, and in general, by a
> vast percentage, Lycomings las longer.
>
> Larry
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 6:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] [COUPERS] Still in Shock!
>
> > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following
any
> advice in this forum.]----
> >
> > I agree.  Everyone I had went out about 1200 hrs.  Gene from IL
> >
> > Larry Wilkins wrote:
> >
> > > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before
following
> any advice in this forum.]----
> > >
> > > 1300 hours?  That's a serious high time engine for a small
Continental.
> I'm
> > > certain I'll be called lots of bad names, but in truth, a
Continental is
> an
> > > 1100 hour engine regardless of the TBO.
> > >
> > > Larry
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 6:46 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [COUPERS-TECH] [COUPERS] Still in Shock!
> > >
> > > > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before
following
> any
> > > advice in this forum.]----
> > > >
> > > > Dear Mitch.
> > > > The Continental C-90 engine seems to be the best matching engine
for
> our
> > > Coupes and even Alons.
> > > > With it you will probably fly faster than with an O-200.
> > > > The O-200 conversion requires a few changes to your plane which
set
> you
> > > back money wise even further.
> > > > One is a new propeller, which can cost you an additional 2000
bucks.
> > > > You are best advised to either get your engine repaired at a
> reasonable
> > > price or get another C-90 and
> > > > sell yours at a core. The Core is still worth something.
> > > > I know one C-90 for sale . Contact me if interested.
> > > >
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > Hartmut
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Well, guess this is the classic new owner nightmare.  I just
purchased
> > > > my 65 Alon in Dec, and thought I had a valid prebuy done. But now
4
> > > > months later and only about 10 hours of flying time I take it in
for
> > > > annual....and get the big shocker!  It's making metal, loads of
> bearing
> > > > material, and my A&P guesses it has been for some time.
> > > >
> > > > The C-90 had about 1300hrs on it when I bought it I really thought
I
> > > > would get a few good years of flying out of it before it had to be
> > > > over-hauled. Worst part is my A&P called the engine shop and looks
> like
> > > > the damage is in the neighborhoood of $11,500 to rebuild!  OUCH!
> > > >
> > > > Now I am looking at options, I know will have to plunk down a pile
of
> > > > money, but wanted to see what I may do other than over-haul the
> current
> > > > engine.  What about an 0-200?  Any opinions on converting to an
0-200?
> > > > Pros?  Cons?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance for your input.
> > > >
> > > > Mitch Hines
> > > > Charlotte, NC
> > > > N6369V
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aVxiLm.aVzvvT
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================



<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to