----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----






----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----





 

Responses below, interspersed in text.

 

Ed Burkhead

http://edburkhead.com/ 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry at MAGIC VAC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 9:49 AM
To: Sydney Cohen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ralph.Maria Finch; Ercoupe Hangar Flying
Subject: Re: [COUPERS-FLYIN] Slowest Cruise Speeds

 

Larry said:

> I think we're all missing the real point here.  

 

There are several points running around here.  The thread started with a
question about low-speed cruise but split into a discussion of low-speed
approaches.  This message is about flying a low speed approach with
resulting high sink rate so I'll discuss that subject.

 

Larry said:

> If you try and extend your glide and come up short, you're 

> going to hit the ground real hard, and it won't be a minor 

> damage situation.  My CFI used to tell me that a good

> landing is one that you can walk away from.  I 

> doubt that 900 ft sink would end up a good landing.  

 

Larry, if you're low OR low and slow, the ONLY options are add power or
land in a field short of the runway.  You NEVER try to extend your glide
with anything but power since the normal approach speed is ALREADY your
best glide ratio.  (Rare exception: approaching against a strong headwind
you might extend your glide by INCREASING your airspeed by 10-20 mph to
improve your penetration against the headwind.)

 

On the other hand, the low speed approach is possible in a Coupe when you
are TOO HIGH.  Yes, you can deliberately get a very good sink rate in a
Coupe if you slow the plane to near minimum flying speed.  Be aware:  in a
Coupe, flown within weight and center of gravity limits, this is NOT a
stalled condition.  You do get some buffeting from some stall burble
coming off the wing root and hitting the empennage but the outer 2/3rds of
the wings should be flying nicely with full control.  (See
<http://www.ercoupe.org/> http://www.ercoupe.org   FAQ section titled:
"This plane is characteristically incapable of spinning? It can't spin or
stall?")

 

If you do an approach in this low-speed/high-sink-rate regime, you MUST
have the intelligence to DROP the nose and regain a normal approach speed
BEFORE contact with the ground.  I found in my flight tests that I'd need
to drop the nose about 150-300 feet above the ground.  This gave another
good drop in altitude but gave a nice airspeed with which to flair and a
nice margin to land with zero sink rate (squeek-squeek).

 

If you aren't smart enough and BRAVE enough to drop the nose when you're
getting close to the ground (so you can get your airspeed up and your sink
rate down), you'd BETTER NOT be trying the low-speed/high-sink-rate Coupe
final approach!!!!!!

 

Larry said:

> And, lest we all miss the point, cut power, pull back on the 

> yoke, and she'll settle into a normal flying attitude, but 

> make no mistake, you are in a stall.

 

Make no mistake! You are NOT in a stall in a Coupe that is within weight,
balance and rigging specs.

 

Flying the approach at 50 mph (4400 fpm) and descending at 1000 fpm gives
you a 4.4:1 glide ratio and that's a pretty steep descent.

 

On the other hand, flying the approach at 65 mph with a little power so
you have 350 fpm rate of descent gives a 16:1 glide ratio (or a 6% glide
angle) and gives you plenty of energy to flare and float a little down the
runway.

 

This isn't all that difficult.  Just BE SURE you drop the nose with AT
LEAST 150-300 feet of altitude left and GET YOUR AIRSPEED BACK TO THE
NORAML RANGE if you ever do try the low-speed/high-sink-rate approach or
you WILL regret it!  ( IMHO :-) ) 

 

Personally, I occasionally used the high sink rate approach under perfect
conditions but usually, if I was so high I needed to lose that much
altitude, I'd just go around.  I practiced it occasionally so it would be
in my repertoire in case of a loss-of-power emergency.

 

Ed Burkhead

http://edburkhead.com/ 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

 



==========================

To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm








==========================

To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm






<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to