I think a separate list for jobs would be more appropriate, it is a great idea, but
keep this list overall just for the technical.
Perhaps even start a separate list for the meeting plannings.
Sean
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 20:57:02 -0500 (EST), Derek Martin wrote:
>On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Derek Martin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Robert W. Fowler III wrote:
>>
>> Then maybe we can post an address where they should be sent, even
>> including it in the standard disclaimer at the end of the messages, so
>> that they can get posted there instead of sucking up bandwidth?
>>
>> If this is my fault, then I appologize to the community. There are better
>> ways to handle this, so I'd like to ask if we can all agree NOT to post
>> job openings on the list.
>
>Well, so far it looks like I'm outvoted, but I will throw out the idea
>that as people post to the list, this opens up the door to headhunters (Hi
>Lori! :) to sign up for the list and then post a slew of messages about
>jobs.
>
>I think it's a BAD idea...
>
>--
>"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" "Who watches the watchmen?"
>-Juvenal, Satires, VI, 347
>
>Derek D. Martin | Senior UNIX Systems/Network Administrator
>Arris Interactive | A Nortel Company
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-------------------------------------------------
>
>
>**********************************************************
>To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
>*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
>unsubscribe gnhlug
>**********************************************************
--
ICQ# 10073477 http://people.ne.mediaone.net/tardis/index.html
A PBS mind in an MTV world.
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
