OK. Sorry about the lack of information. I was more so just asking (which
I realize I wasn't clear about) if anyone has experienced an "general"
difficulty with getting the kernel installed (you know - something like
where Kenny said he had try several kernels before he got one to work on
his hardware and which one worked for him).
One of the first things I learned about kernels is which releases are
development. I started using linux only about 2 years ago so I would still
consider myself a newbie - but I'm still no stranger hacking around with
kernels (not source code, mind you, I'm far to stupid for that).
Thanks,
Paul W
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, PK Whelan wrote:
> > Anyway - compiled it fine several times but can't get the darn thing to
> > go through a boot without a panic.
>
> No offense, but you have effectively said, "It is broken, anyone know what
> is wrong with it?" without giving us *any* information. :-) We need some
> sort of clue as to what is wrong in order to help you out. What error
> messages does the kernel emit before/as it panics? If you don't know how to
> interpret them, copy them all down by hand and type them into an email. :-)
>
> > I've been having problems upgrading to the 2.3.42 kernel...
>
> You are aware that kernel releases with an odd number in the second position
> (e.g., "3" for 2.3.42) are considered "experimental", right?
>
> --
> Ben Scott
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> **********************************************************
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
> *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
> unsubscribe gnhlug
> **********************************************************
>
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
