Michael O'Donnell wrote:
> 
> >When going from a 2.0/2.1 kernel to a 2.2 kernel, you need to
> >upgrade a bunch of things like bunutils, modutils, etc.
> 
> Upgrade my bunutils and modutils?  My wife would not approve...

I apparently need to upgrade my fingerutils......
 
> But more to the point, the failure comes immediately,
> as in: during the first microseconds of life; we're
> nowhere near the point where anything like bunutils
> or modutils could matter.

There are more than just those two packages that need to be upgraded.
Among the packages are: 
- Kernel modutils        2.1.121                 ; insmod -V
- Gnu C                  2.7.2.3                 ; gcc --version
- Binutils               2.8.1.0.23              ; ld -v
- Linux libc5 C Library  5.4.46                  ; ls -l /lib/libc*
- Linux libc6 C Library  2.0.7pre6               ; ls -l /lib/libc*
- Dynamic Linker (ld.so) 1.9.9                   ; ldd --version or ldd
-v
- Linux C++ Library      2.7.2.8                 ; ls -l
/usr/lib/libg++.so.*
- Procps                 2.0.3                   ; ps --version
- Procinfo               16                      ; procinfo -v
- Psmisc                 17                      ; pstree -V
- Net-tools              1.52                    ; hostname -V
- Loadlin                1.6a
- Sh-utils               1.16                    ; basename --v
- Autofs                 3.1.3                   ; automount --version
- NFS                    2.2beta40               ; showmount --version
- Bash                   1.14.7                  ; bash -version
- Ncpfs                  2.2.0                   ; ncpmount -v
- Pcmcia-cs              3.0.14                  ; cardmgr -V
- PPP                    2.3.10                  ; pppd --version
- Util-linux             2.9z                    ; chsh -v
- isdn4k-utils           v3.1beta7               ; isdnctrl 2>&1|grep
version

> It smells much more like
> a problem with, say, CPU-specific magic register
> fondling, or something like that.  I mean, this thing
> just dies immediately, like right after the kernel
> image is dragged into memory and first given control.

I will leave the fondling to professionals such as yourself, but I can
speak from experience about upgrading RH5.2 to a 2.2 kernel. If
everything isn't up to the correct version, you can build it, but they
will not come.

Kenny

**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************

Reply via email to