On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:03:02 +0100, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> David Kastrup wrote: >> [...] >>> > What breach? Distribution of authorized copies fall under first >>> > sale. >>> >>> Sure, but there has been no unconditional authorization. So we are >>> talking about distribution of unauthorized copies. >> >> The act of distribution doesn't turn authorized copies into >> unauthorized copies. The act of distribution is totally irrelevant >> RE determination whether a copy is authorized or not. So once again, >> what breach? > > Conditional authorization does not magically turn into unconditional > authorization. > > It's one of your favorite mistakes.
It's not a mistake. Preaching the gospel of first sale according to Alexander appears to be a life mission. Isaac _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
