Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> > What breach? Distribution of authorized copies fall under first >> > sale. >> >> Sure, but there has been no unconditional authorization. So we are >> talking about distribution of unauthorized copies. > > The act of distribution doesn't turn authorized copies into > unauthorized copies. The act of distribution is totally irrelevant > RE determination whether a copy is authorized or not. So once again, > what breach?
Conditional authorization does not magically turn into unconditional authorization. It's one of your favorite mistakes. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
