David Kastrup wrote: [...] > > The GPL is entirely different T&C, stupid. The BSD doesn't allow > > relicensing under the GPL T&C. Only the BSD T&C apply. > > There is nothing to indicate "Only" in the BSD license. You can > obviously add your own terms.
It is "obvious" only to GNU brainwashed population. > > Why do you think that Windows comes with the complete BSD network > utilities? Stuff like pin and traceroute and so? And what make you think that those utilities are (derivative) works licensed to Microsoft under the BSD license to begin with? > > Why do you think that the BSD license is more popular for proprietary > vendors? I've told you already that EULAs have really nothing to do with (non-exclusive) copyright licenses that contractually convey rights reserved to the copyright owners. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
