David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > > > Correct statement is > > > > The GPL *ILLEGALLY* purports to establishes a pool of software > > > > because the GPL purports to control the licensee's copyrights with > > respect to "all third parties" (i.e. the world) > > No, you are confused again. The GPL gives you permission to pass copies
Read 17 USC 109, idiot. Western Digital: "Plaintiffs claims are barred by the first sale doctrine." Westinghouse: "Plaintiffs claims for relief are barred by the First Sale doctrine." Samsung: "As a separate and distinct Twelfth Affirmative Defense and each claim for relief alleged therein, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs claim for copyright infringement is barred under at least the provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), as Defendant was licensed and any copies alleged to be infringing were, therefore, lawfully made. " regards, alexander. P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the originality standards required by copyright law." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss