Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: >> >> > Correct statement is >> > >> > The GPL *ILLEGALLY* purports to establishes a pool of software >> > >> > because the GPL purports to control the licensee's copyrights with >> > respect to "all third parties" (i.e. the world) >> >> No, you are confused again. The GPL gives you permission to pass copies > > Read 17 USC 109, idiot. > > Western Digital: > > "Plaintiffs claims are barred by the first sale doctrine." > > Westinghouse: > > "Plaintiffs’ claims for relief are barred by the First Sale > doctrine." > > Samsung: > > "As a separate and distinct Twelfth Affirmative Defense and each > claim for relief alleged therein, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ > claim for copyright infringement is barred under at least the > provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), as Defendant was licensed and any > copies alleged to be infringing were, therefore, lawfully made. "
You really have to beat your habit of quoting attempted defenses as if they were of any legal importance. It makes you look stupid. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
