David Kastrup wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes:
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> You really have to beat your habit of quoting attempted defenses as if
> >> they were of any legal importance.
> >
> > Samsung (calling SFLC):
> Wow, now you are quoting imagined sneers.  Talk about an improvement.

How did you manage to find quotation marks in 

Hello SFLC, this is Samsung calling. Please be advised that we've made 1
(ONE) BILLION copies of GPL'd material copied verbatim and/or with
modifications. Please contact us within 3 (THREE) BUSINESS DAYS if you
think that our copies are infringing.

(After three days...)

Samsung (calling SFLC again):

Hello SFLC, this is Samsung calling. Please stick the GPL "permission to
pass copies" in Stallman's big ass as we are going to pass our copies
under 17 USC 109, thank you. 

other than "permission to pass copies" (quoting you) you idiot?

> > Got it now, silly Hyman?
> Looks like your attention span zeroed out again.

For me you both are equaly silly twin GNUtard brothers. 

P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."

Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to