On 4/13/2010 10:09 AM, RJack wrote:
Samsung isn't infringing copyrights.

It is, by copying and distributing GPL-covered software
without complying with the GPL.

So... I'll just ask the question once again. Where is the link to
"BusyBox 0.60.3" which was registered and then claimed as the infringed
work in the SFLC's Comtrend Corp. lawsuit?

The SFLC lawsuit does not claim that BusyBox 0.60.3 is the infringed
work, as can easily be seen by reading the complaint,
The infringed work is "BusyBox". The defendants are required to make
available the version of the BusyBox source code used to create the
binary which they are copying and distributing.
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to