On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:37 AM Brandon Invergo <bran...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Given that nothing has changed in how GNU is being run, it appears that > the cart is being placed well before the horse. However, I would be > shocked if they didn't already expect rms not to step down and therefore > to reject their Social Contract out-of-hand. Given that it is > nevertheless still being written (in public) under conditions where it > will be rejected with almost certainty, I wouldn't be surprised if they > are in fact counting on this to happen. That would give another > opportunity to publicly shame rms and the GNU project as it actually is: > "Look at this beautiful document that rms refused to implement for GNU! > The fact that he *disagrees* with these points shows that he is not fit > to lead GNU anymore!". Nevermind that the rejection is due to its utter > superfluousness given the structure of the GNU project and is not due to > disagreement with the contents.
I read this a few times, but I am unable to see how this qualifies as "kind communication." - Dave
