On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 14:43:11 CDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
Richard Wackerbarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  said:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > BTW, we should have a little 'preferences' dialogue that allows people
> > to add/delete different actions.  Right now its a hard-wired list
> > of 'typical' things; they should be tailored for the account types,
> > as wsell as for the typical user (home vs. business. etc).
> 
> I've been thinking that we should have a shim (perhaps in scheme)
> between the GUI and the data engine so that I, the end user, could
> add/customize meta transactions. That way we could assign a "type"
> to a transaction and display the various (implied) splits in a logical
> manner rather than the nitty-gritty of the model in the engine.

Hmmm...  This sure sounds like a place where the upcoming CLOS-like
functionality of GOOPS could become valuable...

It would be useful for transactions to inherit behaviour and/or
data structure from other transactions, whereby you might have some
generic transaction types that come in by default, that may be
augmented by more specialized behaviour...

[Rob Browning should probably comment here on how robust/functional
GOOPS is/isn't at this point, and the likelihood of it getting useful
soon...]
--
Rules of the Evil Overlord #12. "I will not interrogate my enemies in
the inner sanctum -- a small hotel well outside my borders will work
just as well." 
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/lists/overlord.html>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - <http://www.hex.net/~cbbrowne/lsf.html>

--
Gnucash Developer's List 
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to