[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said:
> >
> > Actually, as far as I can tell, you don't really want to indicate the
> > profit in the register.
>
> ? Insofar as one puts one side of a transsaction into an account
> of type 'income' or 'expense', you *have* recorded a profit/loss,
> and this info is used when the cost-basis repoort is generated.
But if the transfers are from/to your brokerage cash clearing account,
there is no Income/Expense involved unless you add another layer of
indirection. Is that what you're talking about?
> (I'm getting the impression that most folks don't realize or understand
> the significance of the income/expense account types, and we need to
> work on that.)
Quite possibly true. I'm definitely not sure I see how they're to be
used here.
> BTW, we should have a little 'preferences' dialogue that allows people
> to add/delete different actions. Right now its a hard-wired list
> of 'typical' things; they should be tailored for the account types,
> as wsell as for the typical user (home vs. business. etc).
ISRT that the actions are already dependent on the type of the
account. And though I think it might make sense to let the use
augment these types, we'll need some set of well defined types if we
want to have reports that work more or less "out of the box".
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]