Thanks for testing. On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 07:05 -0700, kingneutron wrote: > "beta" b68 as-shipped is *less* stable than "alpha" A7. > > ! Install dialogs are broken for passwords, net config
Can you be more specific here? > ! apt-get is broken, cannot install critical package " sunwtoo ". > sources.list is pointing to stable/testing/unstable, but the pkg is not there. b68 bits are not part of repository yet. > ! Will not install on bare-metal AMD Duron > 900MHz w/ 768MB RAM; no driver for Adaptec 2940UW SCSI card, which is driving > my 7-disk ZFS array in Linux+Vmware currently Driver for old adaptec hardware is not open-sourced... > --I am quite willing to test and help out; hoping for quicker response > times/bugfixes tho. I'm in the middle of migrating to SC, and don't really > have time to waste (no offense.) > > > erast at gnusolaris.org wrote: > > http://www.gnusolaris.org/unstable-iso/ncp_beta1-test3-b68_i386.iso > > > > Changes: > > > > * ON b68 based > > * man pages updated > > > > -- > > Erast > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gnusol-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel > > > > --- Posted via NexentaOS WebForum [M2F v.1.1.3.8] > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gnusol-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel > -- Erast _______________________________________________ gnusol-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel
