Kristoff Bonne wrote: >>> I though that "debian" filled in this part? Or not? >>> >> debian is entirely different distro using different kernel, I don't >> understand what you mean by "filled in this part" >> > Not really. > AFAIK, debian is a OS-distribution which can be build on top of a number > of different kernels. Besides the linux-kernel, there are > debian-distribution on top of the gnu hurd kernel and the freebsd-kernel. > > See here: http://www.debian.org/ports/#nonlinux > > > > So what I wonder is this: can you call nexenta a "debian on top of a > opensolaris kernel"? > > > How much of nexentaCP is "own" code (or ONb68-derived) and how much come > from the "GNU" projects or from debian? >
Nexenta derives from Debian/Ubuntu but there are some kind of licensing problems with "Debian on OpenSolaris". Otherwise, the analogy is correct. From my understanding: the base OS is ON, the packaging system is Debian, the patches to packages to work together are Nexenta. -Tim _______________________________________________ gnusol-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel
