Hi Ross and others,

Apologies - friday afternoon gremlins have crept into our blogging platform 
breaking the link. Here's a sanitised extract of the data:

Price range

JIF Range

JIF Mean

JIF Median

Number of articles

Type

£0-£999

2.263 - 10.472

4.849

4.537

41

44% hybrid 56% full OA

£1000-£1999

0.856 -15.389

6.328

5.117

108

63% hybrid 37% full OA

£2000-£2999

0.986 - 12.594

4.411

3.441

61

100% hybrid

< £3000

5.971 - 15.710

12.363

10.881

17

100% hybrid



The hugely elevated costs for some high impact factor journals are plainly not 
justified, and is another reason why the fascination with impact factors is 
detrimental.

Put simply, looking at the figures large research institutions cannot afford 
Gold OA as it currently stands so Green OA will have to step up and be counted.

Theo

From: Ross Mounce [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 12 October 2012 15:39
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci); ANDREW Theo
Subject: Re: [GOAL] Gold OA: Publication costs and journal impact factors

Dear Theo,

That link didn't work for me. I agree with those observations. I also find it 
ludicrous that such 'high impact factor' journals feel they can charge much 
higher prices for hybrid gold (even though they provide exactly the same 
services) relative to the 'lower impact factor' journals who may even be of a 
higher technical quality e.g. Pensoft Publishing journals & and their XML and 
other additional services.

Have you seen my plot of Gold OA prices by publisher/society?
http://rossmounce.co.uk/2012/09/04/the-gold-oa-plot-v0-2/
and version 0.1 here 
http://rossmounce.co.uk/2012/08/30/a-visualization-of-gold-open-access-options/

The data behind this is also freely available here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtbO6mZEvieCdDFzdkVNQld6Mnc5NEpGWVlRUVhvM3c

perhaps it might be nice to merge our data if there is any overlap?

Best,

Ross

On 12 October 2012 15:11, ANDREW Theo 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear All,

I'd like to draw your attention to a piece of work we have carried out which 
looks at Gold OA fees and journal impact factors:

http://libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk/openscholarship/2012/10/02/impact-cost/

In short, it appears that 1) hybrid journals generally charge more than full OA 
journals independent of journal impact factor, and 2) hybrid journals with high 
impact factors charge significantly more than other types of journal for gold 
open access.

I find this apparent correlation between journal impact factor and cost 
worrying and would welcome feedback. Is this something that other people are 
seeing or have we got our facts wrong?

Kind regards, Theo
__________________________
Theo Andrew
Research Publications Service
Edinburgh University Library

tel.      0131 651 3850
web.   http://bit.ly/UoE-RPS
post.   4 Buccleuch Place,
             Edinburgh, EH8 9LW.
skype. theoandrew


--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.


_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal



--
--
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-
Ross Mounce
PhD Student & Open Knowledge Foundation Panton Fellow
Fossils, Phylogeny and Macroevolution Research Group
University of Bath, 4 South Building, Lab 1.07
http://about.me/rossmounce
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-
_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal

Reply via email to