------------------------------------------------------------------------
Goanetters visiting Viva Goa 2006 in Toronto, Canada on July 29, can use 
the BMX booth as a meeting point. Please list your name on the message 
board that will be provided, courtesy of BMX.

                        http://bmxgoa.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Sunith,

Thanks for your response to my post. I am glad you kept it logical and short. 
Hope we can maintain it that way.

I think you have totally mis-read my post.  You have NOT COMPARED the social 
parameters of "Taliban" society to modern socio-economically advanced society!  
I am not requesting you to score a society. I am requesting a comparison of two 
societies for the same end-points. 

I suggested to compare the RATES for the various parameters for Modern and 
Traditional society. So the following makes no sense to me, "Under Taliban rule 
in Afghanistan. Parameters 1-7 were close to zero. Parameter 8-11 probably 
remained the same. Parameters 12,13 probably decreased or stayed the same. 
Parameters 14-15 decreased dramatically (the Taliban owned all the weapons and 
the killed most of their prisoners)." 

BTW, is Taliban rule representative of modern or old society or neither?  Was 
Taliban rule even a society - Muslim or Afghan society?

So before you digress (old Goanet trick), why don’t you check the data for the 
parameters that I outlined. Then compare those end-points for a modern and 
traditional- Goan Muslim, Hindu and Catholic societies?  

That in part may be difficult to research from Panaji. You may not have access 
to western data (or be exposed to it) unless you are well conversant with US or 
UK or EU statistics.  Yet you could do it with the help of Santosh and 
Elisabeth. You live in Panaji-Goa, which may be in transition from old to new 
society. So you may or may not have a glimpse of the issues.

Since you are young, I strongly urge you to look at the hard statistics / data 
/ numbers - no explanations needed!  Do not be satisfied with just giving 
opinions and having impressions; or dismissing other peoples' views (including 
older folks) with terms (not your's)  like "hackneyed" and "cliched" 
terminologies.  If the above two US residents do not cooperate in giving you 
the American data, that says a lot. It is perhaps, they are arm-chair 
discussants, or more likely, the statistics are so bad that they do not want to 
frighten you and the rest of us. It is not because they are "too intellectual" 
to work with you. 
 
The parameters you outline (2, 4, 5) like wars, "self determined democratic 
political systems" is a reflection of the government rather than the society 
governed.  So I hope we can talk the same semantics referenced to the same 
subject group. 

I share your optimism for the future. As one progresses socio-economically, the 
skill is to learn from societies and others that have been down that path and 
avoid their pitfalls.  A good modern society to emulate is Japanese and rural 
US society.  Your challenge is how to emulate the good while avoiding the 
potholes. Panjim and Goa is a good incubator to hold-on to the age-tested 
values while also incorporating SOME WELL-TESTED new outlooks.  So the old and 
new is NOT mutually EXCLUSIVE. It is not one OR the other, as some on Goanet 
make it out to be.  One's smartness and innovation is how one can have both!  
It can be done. By the grace of God we and many others have achieved both.  

Response to your other points in another post.
Kind Regards, GL

 
---------------- Sunith Velho, Panjim-Goa wrote: 
 
As a supporter of scientific and logical argument will try to disapprove your 
simplistic analysis to support your belief that " today's society is spinning 
out of control " 
    Under Taliban rule in Afghanistan. Parameters 1-7 were close to zero. 
Parameter 8-11 probably remained the same. Parameters 12,13 probably 
decreased or stayed the same. Parameters 14-15 decreased dramatically (the 
Taliban owned all the weapons and the killed most of their prisoners). 
    So we can see that these parameters when used alone tell us nothing 
about the state of a society. 
    I submit that some useful parameters for evaluating the state of world 
society would be 
    1. Female emancipation and equality. (After all half the world is female) 
    2. Number of Major Conflicts/Wars(In terms of number of deaths) 
    3. Racial tolerance 
    4. Religious/Belief Tolerance 
    5. Number of people living in self determined democratic political systems. 
    What is your opinion of human progress w.r.t. these parameters(especially 
over the last century)? 
    Goanetters can add to that list.
_______________________________________________
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org

Reply via email to