-----Original Message-----
From: Gilbert Lawrence
> So now we have web-links on both sides of the issue (not
> surprisingly). Who is to tell / say which web-link is
> more of an authority?
RESPONSE: The onus is on the reader. And depends on the topic. For eg.
Obtaining gardening tips from a sports weblink is not recommended just
as much as obtaining tips to bat like Sachin Tendulkar from a home
improvement website.
> So we should stop being childish and hit each other on the head;
> with merely posting new web-links. If one wants to rebut the
> articles, from one's own personal knowledge, please do so. If not
> the 'Copy and Paste' contrary article(s) without being able to vouch
> for the scientific validity of the new link is meaningless.
> I have no objection to posting other articles to balance the
> perspectives of the initial article. That expands the dialog without
> the "I am smarter than you" approach of those who are skilled at
> web-surfing.
RESPONSE: The above two paragraphs contradict each other. It is not
clear where exactly you stand? Are you for or against contra views??
- B
