On 1/19/21 4:53 PM, Axel Wagner wrote: > > Yes. And there are definitely syntactical choices that can be decoupled - like > how we went from `(type T)` to `[T any]`. Not having type parameters or ways > to > constrain them, though, is more than just a syntactical choice. It removes the > actual core of the design. Of the ten bullet points in the high-level design > description
I believe my suggestion included constraints in the function parameter list whilst avoiding the needless abstraction? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/56a0130c-64d5-c4a8-ddda-9d22abd99565%40gmail.com.
