On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:08 PM Kevin Chadwick <m8il1i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe my suggestion included constraints in the function parameter list > whilst avoiding the needless abstraction? > Apologies then. I assumed you where trying to amend OPs suggestion, which was specifically to abscond with type parameters and the ability to express constraints. Note the topic of this thread: »instead of generics, why cant we just implement an "any" builtin?« > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/56a0130c-64d5-c4a8-ddda-9d22abd99565%40gmail.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAEkBMfG6w5hDB6ERq1OWCFuqP1f4awQpCpwaRXTMi_19v80A2g%40mail.gmail.com.
