On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 1:36 PM Kevin Chadwick <m8il1i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/19/21 12:21 PM, Axel Wagner wrote: > > And, of course, you can change the suggested syntax again. But every > time you do > > a change like that, you are flushing the entire previous discussion down > the > > drain, because we now have to re-consider all aspects of the design, from > > tokenization, over parsing to type-checking and implementation etc. > > OK, but using a T all over the place, sucks. > That is a fair opinion to hold. But if you don't like the current design and want an alternative (or nothing at all) to happen, the strategy of just saying "it sucks" just isn't going to be very effective towards that goal. Because you'll need to actually get specific people on board for that and they are unlikely to get swayed by simplistic rhetoric like that. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/f6e17dd3-91d5-39eb-7aa2-42f8058f13af%40gmail.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAEkBMfEB1sBiWMJH0MhMx1CGmaAsvGxQk0_MyY5CxBAf0Em39Q%40mail.gmail.com.
