On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Charles MacDonald <[email protected]>wrote:
> The new license forbade commercial use to stop these people, mainly > because communication with them failed and they were hostile when > asked to stop. I realize simply changing the license won't stop them, > to be honest it was a decision made purely out of frustration. > I'm sorry that you've dealt with so many compliance issues. There are resources for dealing specifically with GPL enforcement if your project has a clean copyright history. Have you gotten in touch with any of them? In my personal view, and as you've noted, adding a field-of-use restriction to the project's license is unlikely to stop people who didn't comply with the original license. Of course, you and other copyright holders are welcome to choose the license that you prefer. > I've known about Eke's derivative work (Genesis Plus GX) for a long > time now and I am in total support of it. What would it take to get > the project back on Google Code? I'll do whatever it takes. > Having it available under one or more OSI-approved open source licenses. No more, no less. I'll respond in more detail in another thread. -- Lucas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Project Hosting on Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en.
