In this case you will notice it at the end of the subround, thus before the second or third one, and everything will be ok.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Vexorian<[email protected]> wrote: > > You could get thrown out of the top 1000 without cheating if you > accidentally submit a wrong code for one of the problems. > > > On Sep 9, 9:18 am, Jeroen van Erp <[email protected]> wrote: >> If the Code Jam team has set it up the same as in the Qualifying round, the >> results of your large sets will be available immediately after the round is >> finished. This means that you will only get bumped off the list if you've >> cheated, in which case you're eliminated anyway. So in essence some people >> might suddenly advance to round 2 where they weren't eligible before, >> because some in the top 1000 cheated. You will at most have competed in one >> (or two) round too many :-). >> >> If you're through in round 1a (ie. top 1000), you don't need to compete in >> any further rounds, and if you've cheated you will be removed from the >> results so there is no need to compete in any further rounds. >> >> If you're not through at first in round 1a, you can participate in round 1b, >> but you might still advance through your results in round1a if people above >> your rank are removed due to cheating. >> >> So I don't see your problem... >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Vexorian <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Considering the little time between rounds, shouldn't coders be >> > allowed to participate in further rounds even if they advanced? It is >> > unlikely we will have official results for 1A before the beginning of >> > 1B. >> >> > Even if we control ourselves and avoid competing in further rounds >> > when we know we advanced, some people will still have no idea whether >> > they advanced or not. Consider a coder that was 1020th in round 1A, he >> > will have to participate in 1B/C because it appears he didn't advance, >> > but then if 5 days later, 20 guys on the top 1000 from 1A are >> > eliminated, he would have participated in 1B/C even though he already >> > advanced... >> >> > On Sep 8, 11:50 pm, Bartholomew Furrow <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > We've decided to allow all contestants to compete in all subrounds of >> > Round >> > > 1 -- unless they qualified for Round 2 in an earlier subround. Good luck >> > to >> > > everyone in Round 1! >> > > *FAQ* >> >> > > Q: Where is my qualification email!? >> > > A: We haven't sent them yet, because we're still dealing with cheaters. >> > > Sorry for the delay! We realize it's inconvenient, and we'll work >> > faster >> > > next time. >> >> > > Q: How do I know if I qualified? >> > > A: If you have at least 33 points and you didn't cheat, then you >> > qualified. >> >> > > Q: Which subrounds of Round 1 can I participate in? >> > > A: All of them. You can compete in Round 1A, Round 1B and Round 1C >> > (until >> > > you qualify for Round 2). >> >> > > Q: Can I still change my subround preferences? >> > > A: ...I guess so, but it won't do anything. >> >> > > Cheers, >> > > Bartholomew >> >> > > P.S. This isn't the official announcement of your subround assignment; >> > that >> > > will come out in the emails. I just wanted to give you guys a heads-up. >> >> -- >> Jeroen van Erp >> +31-6-30110807 >> >> Take Nothing But Pictures >> Kill Nothing But Time >> Leave Nothing But Footprints > > > -- M@ http://matteolandi.altervista.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
