On Aug 29, 11:47 am, buttman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, that seems like a huge pain in the ass. >
No pain, no gain. ;-) > > The limit seems to be 3MB compressed, which is just about right at my > limit. I don't really care about how long it takes to render, as long > as the map can be scrolled smoothly without needing 8GB of RAM. > Your subject line says " best way (performance wise) ..." KML will require both more memory and more time to load. I think what you really mean by "performance" is "least amount of work for me" ;-) -- Marcelo - http://maps.forum.nu -- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
